aws-solution-architect

Checked out your AWS solution architect skill and noticed it's tackling the infrastructure-as-code problem space—curious how you're thinking about the balance between prescriptive guidance and letting users make their own architectural tradeoffs, especially at a 58/100 where some of those fundamentals might still be settling.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 58/100, which lands this in F territory. Based on Anthropic's skill evaluation standards, your strongest area is Spec Compliance (11/15), but you're really struggling with Progressive Disclosure Architecture (13/30) and Writing Style (5/10). The gap between what you're covering and how you're organizing it is the main lever here.

What's Working Well

• Solid frontmatter - Your YAML metadata is clean and spec-compliant with all required fields present
• Consistent AWS terminology - You're using service names accurately throughout (Lambda, DynamoDB, EventBridge, etc.), which makes the content technically sound
• Multiple architecture patterns - You've included serverless, containerized, and hybrid approaches, giving users actual options to consider

The Big One: All 345 Lines in One File

This is crushing your PDA score. Right now, everything—architecture patterns, best practices, service guides, security considerations—is crammed into a single monolithic SKILL.md. That violates progressive disclosure entirely.

The fix: Split into a reference-based structure:

• Keep SKILL.md under 100 lines with just the overview and capabilities
• Create references/architecture-patterns.md for serverless/container/hybrid patterns
• Create references/service-selection-guide.md for choosing DynamoDB vs...