codex-cli-bridge

I checked out your codex-cli-bridge skill and can see you're tackling a real problem—bridging Claude Code and Codex CLI ecosystems. The utility here is solid, and the modular architecture shows good planning. Let me walk you through what's holding you back from a stronger score.

Links:

• GitHub
• SkillzWave Marketplace

TL;DR

You're at 72/100, solidly in C territory. Your strongest pillar is Utility (17/20)—the skill solves a real interoperability problem with concrete value. Weakest spots: Spec Compliance (10/15) and Writing Style (6/10). Two high-priority fixes would push you into B range.

What's Working Well

• Real problem-solving: You identified and solved an actual gap between Claude Code and Codex CLI. That's the kind of utility that matters.
• Modular design: Six specialized Python modules (safety_mechanism, claude_parser, etc.) show solid architectural thinking.
• Validation built in: The --validate flag and troubleshooting section give users confidence the bridge actually works.
• Multiple reference documents: SKILL.md, README.md, and HOW_TO_USE.md show good progressive disclosure attempt—just needs tightening.

The Big One: Missing Trigger Phrases

Your frontmatter description has no trigger phrases, and that's costing you 2 points on spec compliance. The current description explains what the skill does, but doesn't tell Claude when to activate it.

Current:

description: Bridge between Claude Code and OpenAI Codex CLI - generates AGENTS.md from CLAUDE.md...

Fix it to:

description: Performs codex cli bridge operations. Use when asked to "codex cli bridge", "generate AGENTS.md from CLAUDE.md", "sync with Codex CLI", or "codex cli help".

This single fix gets you +2 points. The pattern matters—triggers need to be action-oriented and cover the main use cases.

Other Things Worth Fixing

1. Add a Table of Contents to SKILL.md (22 PDA points → 24)

   • Your SKILL.md is 349 lines without a TOC, and the grader penalizes this
   • Add a simple TOC right after the frontmatter with 5-6 main sections
   • Impact: +2 points

2. Cut the verbose Python module descriptions (22 PDA → 25)

   • Lines 110-146 detail each module in SKILL.md—that belongs in README.md, not your overview
   • Replace with a one-liner: "Six specialized modules handle environment validation, parsing, analysis, and output generation. See README.md for details."
   • Impact: +3 points

3. Fix your voice inconsistency (6 writing style → 8)

   • You mix "This skill creates..." (declarative), "Generate AGENTS.md" (imperative), and "you have access to" (second-person)
   • Pick one voice throughout—imperative is cleanest for skills: "Generate AGENTS.md", "Validate environments", "Parse configuration"
   • Impact: +2 points

4. Strip the marketing language

   • "seamless interoperability", emojis (✅, ❌, ❤️), and "Built with" phrasing read like marketing, not technical docs
   • Replace with plain language: "provides interoperability", "success/failure", "Created using"
   • Impact: +1 point

Quick Wins Summary

That's +10 points with roughly 25 minutes of work—gets you to 82/100 (B-range).

Checkout your skill here: SkillzWave.ai | SpillWave We have an agentic skill installer that installs skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.