slash-command-factory

I've been digging into how skills handle CLI argument parsing, and I'm curious how you're thinking about the command pattern here—the factory approach seems like it's trying to solve the "too many conditional branches" problem, but I wonder if you've hit any rough edges with skill registration or command composition at scale.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 72/100, solid C-grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's grading rubric for agentic skills. Your strongest area is Ease of Use (20/25)—the metadata and trigger terms are really well thought out. The real drag is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (18/30)—you've got a 1007-line SKILL.md that's trying to do way too much in one place.

What's Working Well

• Excellent metadata design — Your description with multiple trigger terms ("slash commands", "custom commands", "presets") makes discoverability solid. The skill name and structure are clean.
• 10 useful presets — The preset command patterns (error_handler, logger, formatter, etc.) solve real problems and show you've thought about common use cases.
• Good workflow clarity — The 5-7 question flow and the dual paths (official patterns + custom generation) give users real flexibility without overwhelming them.

The Big One: Token Economy is Killing Your Score

Your SKILL.md at 1007 lines violates Progressive Disclosure Architecture principles. You're repeating full preset details 3+ times, showing verbose naming convention algorithms, and packing everything into one file when you should be layering it.

Here's what needs to happen:

• Cut SKILL.md down to 200-300 lines: frontmatter + overview + the 3 main command patterns + a summary of the q...