validation-report-generator

I was looking at your validation-report-generator and noticed how you've structured the progressive disclosure—most skills front-load their complexity, but you've managed to keep the token efficiency tight while still covering the edge cases. That's a solid A-grade approach.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 93/100, solidly in A territory. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for skill structure and usability. Your strongest area is Writing Style (9/10)—the voice stays consistent and instructional throughout. The weakness is Spec Compliance (11/15), mainly because your description field is missing trigger phrases that help users discover the skill.

What's Working Well

• Layered architecture is chef's kiss: SKILL.md points cleanly to report-template.md and verdict-criteria.md without burying details. The reference depth is perfect at one level down.
• Terminology consistency across files: You use "verdict," "validation," and "bulletproof" uniformly, which makes the skill feel cohesive and easy to follow.
• Quality checklist before delivery: The 10-point verification list in the Quality Checklist section is excellent—it shows you thought about how users actually use this, not just the happy path.
• Tone calibration guidance: Letting users adjust tone (confident vs. diplomatic) while keeping structure rigid is the right balance. It gives freedom without chaos.

The Big One: Add Trigger Phrases to Description

Your frontmatter description needs actual trigger keywords. Right now it reads:

description: Generate structured 8-section validation reports with verdict (GOOD/BAD/NEEDS MAJOR WORK)...

The system needs phrases like "Use when asked to..." so it can match user queries. Update it to:

description: Generate structured 8-section validation reports with verdict (GOOD/BAD/NEEDS MAJOR WORK), strengths, and critical flaws. Use when asked to "generate validation report", "create validation feedback", "produce validation analysis", or "validation report generator".

Impact: +2 points on Spec Compliance (bumps you from 11/15 to 13/15).

Other Things Worth Fixing

1. Add a TOC to SKILL.md – At 289 lines, it needs a table of contents after the frontmatter. Users scrolling through will appreciate quick navigation to "Report Structure," "Generating the Report," and "Quality Checklist." (+3 points to PDA)

2. Cut the redundant template – Lines 193-264 in SKILL.md duplicate what's already in report-template.md. Replace those lines with a 3-line pointer: "Use the Report Template to structure output. The template includes all 8 sections with formatting and tone calibration guidance." Saves tokens and reduces confusion. (+2 points to PDA)

3. Verdict criteria duplication – Your Step 2 explanation (SKILL.md lines 148-168) repeats what verdict-criteria.md already covers. Just reference the file instead of rewriting it.

Quick Wins

• Add trigger phrases to frontmatter description → +2 points
• TOC in main SKILL.md → +3 points
• Cut redundant template section → +2 points
• Those three fixes alone get you to 95-96/100

Checkout your skill here: SkillzWave.ai | SpillWave We have an agentic skill installer that install skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.