ms365-tenant-manager

I just ran the grading rubric on your ms365-tenant-manager skill and noticed you're handling some genuinely complex multi-tenant orchestration—the architecture scores well, but the Progressive Disclosure could use some attention at 72/100. Have you considered breaking down the higher-level concepts earlier so developers don't hit a wall when they're trying to understand the tenant isolation strategy?

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 72/100, solid C-grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for skill design. Your Utility section is genuinely strong (15/20)—the PowerShell automation and security guidance addresses real gaps in M365 admin tooling. But Progressive Disclosure and Ease of Use are dragging you down (18/30 and 18/25). The biggest issue? You've got two files saying almost the exact same thing, which burns through developer tokens without adding depth.

What's Working Well

• Utility hits the mark. You're solving actual M365 problems—user management at scale, security policies, tenant configuration. That's real value, not fluff.
• Quality checklist in the pre-commit section is a nice touch. The validation approach with -WhatIf parameters shows you understand safe operations.
• Frontmatter is clean. Your YAML is valid, naming convention is correct (hyphen-case), and you've got the required fields locked down.
• Grep-friendly structure. Your skill is easy to parse and index—solid infrastructure underneath.

The Big One: Content Duplication Killing Your PDA Score

Here's what's happening: HOW_TO_USE.md duplicates about 70% of SKILL.md instead of providing reference depth. Sections like "What You'll Get," "Prerequisites," and "Safety & Best Prac...