markdown-quality

I took a look at your markdown-quality skill and wanted to share some thoughts.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 75/100, which lands you in C territory (70-79 range). This is solid fundamentals with a good foundation to build on. Your Ease of Use pillar is strong at 21/25, but Progressive Disclosure Architecture (22/30) and Utility (15/20) are dragging the score down. You're addressing a real workflow problem, but the execution could punch harder.

What's Working Well

• Clear metadata — Your frontmatter is clean and valid, and the trigger phrase "creating or editing any markdown file" is spot-on for discoverability
• Tight information density — Concise content with good use of tables and lists; you're not wasting tokens on fluff
• Solid workflow loop — The run→check→fix iteration cycle is explicitly documented, which gives developers a clear mental model

The Big One: Limited Utility Scope

Here's the thing: your skill enforces standard linting discipline, which is valuable, but it doesn't teach Claude anything new about markdown. It's a process enforcer, not a capability enhancer.

Why it matters: Utility is 20% of your score. Right now you're at 15/20 because the skill mostly says "run markdownlint and fix errors" — which is... what developers already do.

The fix: Add actual markdown best practices or error-fixing guidance. Examples:

• Common markdownlint errors and how to fix them (spacing, heading hierarchy, list formatting)
• .markdownlint.json configuration guidance for different project types
• Markdown patterns that are technically valid but bad for readability

This could easily net you +3 points and move you toward 78/100 (solid B r...