brand-narrative-playbook

I started poking through your skill and noticed you're tackling narrative consistency across brand touchpoints—that's a genuinely tricky problem space. Your approach scores 70/100, which tells me the foundation is solid but there's some room to tighten up the execution and documentation to really maximize its impact.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 70/100, which is solidly C territory. Based on Anthropic's skill grading rubric, your strongest area is Writing Style (8/10)—the narrative framework doc reads clearly and maintains professional objectivity throughout. The weakest link is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (20/30)—you're promising templates and reference files that don't actually exist in the package, which breaks the expected layered structure.

What's Working Well

• Clear narrative framework. Your five-step arc (audience grid, narrative arc, proof points, channels, validation) is well-structured and the examples in narrative_framework.md actually show how these pieces fit together.
• Consistent terminology. Using "pillar," "proof," and "narrative arc" throughout keeps things coherent without conflicting definitions muddying the waters.
• Professional tone. No marketing fluff—this reads like someone who understands the problem, not someone selling snake oil.

The Big One: Missing Referenced Assets

This is the main anchor dragging your score down. Your SKILL.md promises three specific deliverables on lines 23-25:

• Messaging hierarchy doc with prompts
• Storyboard slides for different audiences
• QA checklist for validation

But these files don't exist in the references/ directory. When people load this skill expecting those templates, they'...