conversion-diagnostic-kit

I've been digging into conversion optimization toolkits, and your diagnostic approach is interesting—though the execution feels like it's caught between being a reference guide and an interactive tool. What's the vision here: is this meant to help developers understand conversion problems or solve them?

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 66/100, solidly in D territory. This is based on Anthropic's progressive disclosure architecture standards for agentic skills. Your strongest area is spec compliance (11/15)—the frontmatter is clean. Your weakest is utility (11/20)—the framework describes what to do but doesn't actually enable developers to do it.

What's Working Well

• Valid YAML frontmatter - Name follows conventions perfectly, and the structure is technically sound
• Consistent terminology - "Signal Stack," "Segmentation Grid," "Conversion Taxonomy"—you're building a coherent mental model
• Real-world focus - You're tackling an actual gap (conversion diagnostics), not solving problems that don't exist

The Big One: Missing Templates & Reference Files

Here's what's eating 6+ points: you mention three templates (workbook, standup agenda, experiment brief) but don't actually provide them. This kills your utility score because developers are left saying, "okay, how do I structure this stuff?"

Fix: Create a references/ directory with actual files:

• references/templates/diagnostic-workbook.md - Data inputs, findings capture format
• references/templates/standup-agenda.md - Cross-functional war room structure
• references/templates/experiment-brief.md - Hypothesis, KPIs, guardrails template

Even stub templates would add 6 points because they shift this ...