expansion-plays

I noticed your expansion-plays skill tackles a complex problem—managing growth strategies across different contexts. The current implementation sits at 62/100, which suggests the core logic is solid but there's room to make it more discoverable and easier to integrate.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 62/100, grade D territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices rubric. Your strongest area is Spec Compliance (12/15)—the metadata and YAML structure are solid. The real gap is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (15/30) and Utility (11/20). You've got a good framework, but it needs teeth: actual templates, concrete execution steps, and validation loops.

What's Working Well

• Valid frontmatter and naming conventions – Your YAML is clean and follows hyphen-case correctly
• Clear trigger phrases – "cross-sell", "upsell", "expansion" map well to GTM use cases
• Logical 5-step framework – Signal Stack → Design → Execute → Measure creates a sensible flow
• Objective tone – No marketing fluff, stays instructional and practical

The Big One: Missing Reference Files

Here's what's holding you back: you mention three templates (readiness checklist, QBR deck outline, offer matrix) but they don't exist as actual files. This kills both PDA and Utility scores because users can't actually use them.

Fix: Create three reference files:

• references/expansion-readiness-checklist.md – Concrete checkboxes for accounts
• references/qbr-deck-outline.md – Actual slide structure, not just a concept
• references/offer-matrix-template.md – A real 2D table (personas × triggers × CTAs)

This alone gets you +6 points and makes your skill actually actionable.

Ot...