packaging-framework

I took a look at your packaging-framework skill and noticed the implementation focuses heavily on GTM strategy, but the documentation could use more context around why certain framework decisions were made—especially around how to validate that a packaging design actually works in market.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 60/100, D grade. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for agentic skills. Your strongest area is Spec Compliance (11/15)—the YAML structure is clean and properly formatted. The real drag is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (14/30)—you're putting everything in one file when separate reference docs would make this way more useful, and Utility (10/20) because the framework reads more like a scaffold than an actionable tool.

What's Working Well

• Clean metadata structure – Your frontmatter is valid YAML with all required fields properly formatted
• Solid framework flow – The 5-step progression (Segmentation → Metrics → Competitive → Narrative → Measurement) actually makes sense as a workflow
• Practical GTM focus – You're addressing a real problem: pricing decisions are messy, and structure helps. That's legitimate utility.

The Big One: Missing Templates & Validation Steps

The skill lists templates (packaging matrix, competitive comparison, sales enablement one-pager) but doesn't actually provide them. This is your biggest opportunity for improvement. Right now someone reads your skill and gets the idea of what to do, but not the how.

The fix: Create a references/ directory with three template files:

• references/packaging-matrix-template.md – actual structure with columns, sample data, decision logic
• `references/competitive-c...