pricing-governance

I've been reading through your pricing-governance skill and noticed you're tackling a genuine governance challenge—defining decision-making frameworks is tricky. That said, the skill feels more like a consulting doc than something an agent can actually use, and that's holding back your score pretty significantly.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 53/100, which puts you in F territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill grading rubric focusing on practical utility for agents. Your Spec Compliance is solid (11/15)—frontmatter is clean, naming conventions are correct. But Utility (8/20) and Progressive Disclosure Architecture (12/30) are dragging you down. The core issue: you've got a solid conceptual framework, but no actual templates, examples, or step-by-step workflow an agent could execute.

What's Working Well

• Clean metadata structure – Your YAML frontmatter is valid and follows conventions properly.
• Conceptually sound framework – The five components (Council Charter, Decision Log, Approval Matrix, Communication Templates, Audit Trail) map real governance needs.
• Professional tone – The writing is objective and business-appropriate throughout.

The Big One: Missing Templates and Examples

This is your score killer. You mention "Templates" and "Decision log spreadsheet with filters" but never actually provide them. An agent reading your skill knows what to create but not what it looks like.

Here's the fix: Create a references/ directory with actual templates:

• references/council-charter-template.md – sample roles, members, decision cadence
• references/decision-log-template.md – filled example with columns and sample entries
• `references/approval-ma...