whitepapers

31 stars 7 forks
28
D

Use when producing research-heavy whitepapers or technical guides that require structured argumentation and data.

Marketplace

Third-Party Agent Skill: Review the code before installing. Agent skills execute in your AI assistant's environment and can access your files. Learn more about security

Installation for Agentic Skill

View all platforms →
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/whitepapers
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/whitepapers --agent opencode
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/whitepapers --agent codex
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/whitepapers --agent gemini

First time? Install Skilz: pip install skilz

Works with 22+ AI coding assistants

Cursor, Aider, Copilot, Windsurf, Qwen, Kimi, and more...

View All Agents
Download Agent Skill ZIP

Extract and copy to ~/.claude/skills/ then restart Claude Desktop

1. Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/gtmagents/gtm-agents
2. Copy the agent skill directory:
cp -r gtm-agents/plugins/content-marketing/skills/whitepapers ~/.claude/skills/

Need detailed installation help? Check our platform-specific guides:

Related Agentic Skills

Agentic Skill Details

Repository
gtm-agents
Stars
31
Forks
7
Type
Non-Technical
Meta-Domain
data ai
Primary Domain
data analysis
Market Score
28

Agent Skill Grade

D
Score: 63/100 Click to see breakdown

Score Breakdown

Spec Compliance
12/15
PDA Architecture
16/30
Ease of Use
17/25
Writing Style
6/10
Utility
11/20
Modifiers: +1

Areas to Improve

  • Missing Reference Files
  • Weak Trigger Terms
  • Non-Actionable Framework Steps

Recommendations

  • Focus on improving Pda (currently 16/30)
  • Focus on improving Utility (currently 11/20)
  • Address 2 high-severity issues first

Graded: 2026-01-24

Developer Feedback

I noticed you're tackling the whitepaper generation problem—a solid use case for LLM-powered content systems. With a D-grade score (63/100), there's real potential here, but the implementation seems to be hitting some structural friction that's holding back its impact.

Links:

The TL;DR

You're at 63/100, solidly D-grade territory. The report bases this on Anthropic's 5-pillar framework for agentic skills. Your strongest area is Spec Compliance (12/15)—the YAML structure and naming conventions are clean. But Progressive Disclosure Architecture (16/30) and Utility (11/20) are dragging you down hard. The skill reads like a high-level process guide rather than something Claude can actually execute.

What's Working Well

  • Clean metadata – Your frontmatter is valid YAML with required fields properly formatted
  • Solid compliance foundation – Following naming conventions (hyphen-case) and structure correctly
  • Actionable framework exists – You've got a numbered 5-step process that gives Claude a path forward, even if it needs refinement

The Big One: Missing Progressive Disclosure

Your skill is only 33 lines and stuffs everything inline. That's a 16/30 on PDA—you're losing 14 points just from lack of structure.

The problem: You mention "Templates listed inline: Draft manuscript with references + citations" but don't provide actual templates. Claude can't execute vague references. You need a references/ directory with:

  • references/templates/executive-summary.md (actual template, not description)
  • references/methodology-guide.md (detailed research approach)
  • references/compliance-checklist.md (validation steps)

This alone gets you +8 points and makes the skill actually ...

Report Security Issue

Found a security vulnerability in this agent skill?