docusaurus-plugins

I came across your docusaurus-plugins skill and noticed you're tackling the plugin architecture side of things—that's where a lot of the extensibility complexity lives. The 87/100 score suggests you've nailed the core approach, but I'm curious what trade-offs you made between flexibility and ease of use in the plugin interface design.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 87/100, solidly in B territory (good work with minor polish needed). This is based on Anthropic's Claude skills best practices. Your biggest strength is Writing Style (10/10—clean, imperative voice throughout), and your reference architecture is solid. Weakest link is Spec Compliance (12/15), mostly because the description could cast a wider net with trigger phrases.

What's Working Well

• Reference architecture is textbook PDA: You've got SKILL.md as the 66-line entry point, then 6 separate reference files for deeper dives (lifecycle-plugins, rehype-plugins, theme-plugins, etc.). That's exactly the layering Claude agents need—get context fast, then dive deep without bloat.

• Trigger coverage is solid: "remark, rehype, theme, content, lifecycle" terms are all in the description and hit real use cases. When someone's building a custom content transformer, they'll find this.

• Voice and tone are crisp: No marketing fluff, no second-person "you should." Just imperative instructions ("transforms", "implements", "use"). That's the right register for developer tools.

• Utility is maxed at 20/20: Your examples show real patterns (glossary plugins, analytics tracking), and you give enough flexibility that devel...