docusaurus-plugins

I found your docusaurus-plugins skill while reviewing documentation tooling approaches—the way you've structured the progressive disclosure around plugin architecture is solid, though there's some room to tighten up the spec compliance that's keeping it at a B grade rather than higher.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 82/100, firmly in B territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices. Your Utility scores highest at 19/20—the skill genuinely solves a real problem across all 5 plugin types. Your weakest spot is Spec Compliance at 12/15, mostly because the description triggers are sparse and some metadata could be richer.

What's Working Well

• Perfect layering: SKILL.md stays lean at 66 lines while 6 reference files handle the depth. That's exactly how progressive disclosure should work.
• Comprehensive coverage: You've got remark, rehype, theme, content, and lifecycle plugins all mapped out with real-world patterns. That's the kind of degrees of freedom developers actually need.
• Token-efficient: Dense, Claude-appropriate writing with no filler. Every code block earns its place.
• Consistent examples: The plugin structure templates are clear, and you show variation across different plugin types so it doesn't feel like copy-paste guidance.

The Big One: Missing Navigation in Long References

Your reference files are 454-684 lines each—that's a navigation problem. Right now they just start with content, which makes it harder for Claude (and humans) to jump to what they need.

Fix: Add a table of contents after each reference file's title:

## Table of Contents
- [When to Use](#when-to-use)
- [Plugin Structure](#plugin-structure)
- [Examples](#examples)
- [Best Practices](#best-p...