github-actions

I was reviewing your github-actions skill and noticed you've got a solid foundation for CI/CD automation—the B grade reflects some strong decisions, though there's room to tighten up the docs and a few edge cases in the implementation.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 87/100, solidly in B territory. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for skill architecture. Your Writing Style is actually your strongest pillar at 9/10—the technical voice is clean and imperative throughout. The weaknesses are more structural: your Progressive Disclosure Architecture (23/30) has some duplication between files, and Ease of Use (22/25) is missing workflow steps for complex patterns.

What's Working Well

• Writing style is tight. Purely instructional, no fluff, code-focused with brief explanations. That's exactly what Claude needs.
• Solid trigger coverage. Your skill description hits the right discovery keywords (matrix testing, caching, publishing, release automation), so it'll activate when people actually need it.
• Practical reference depth. You split triggers and secrets into separate files correctly—that's the right layering. Just needs some cleanup.
• Real-world templates. The npm publishing and VSCode extension workflows address actual gaps. That's useful niche work.

The Big One: Reference File Duplication

Your biggest efficiency hit is repeating workflow trigger examples in both SKILL.md (lines 127-138) and references/triggers.md. This breaks the layered structure principle and costs you 2-3 points on Progressive Disclosure.

Fix: In SKILL.md, replace the full trigger examples with a summary line that points to the reference:

## Workflow Triggers

See [references/triggers.md](references/trigg...