npm-publishing

I found your npm-publishing skill while reviewing package tooling approaches—the way you've structured the package.json validation logic is particularly clean. At 89 points, you're hitting solid ground, but I'm curious what you're doing differently compared to standard publishing workflows that warranted this depth of documentation.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 89/100, B grade—solidly production-ready. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for agentic skills. Your strongest area is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (27/30)—the SKILL.md is genuinely concise with proper delegation to reference files. Weakest spots are Spec Compliance (12/15) and Utility (18/20), where you're missing trigger phrases and complete workflow templates.

What's Working Well

• Dense, practical content: Your code examples earn their tokens without fluff. The scopes.md and tags.md references are exactly one level deep—textbook PDA structure.
• Clear command patterns: The versioning and publishing commands flow logically with validation steps (npm pack, dry-run). The prepublishOnly hook examples show real feedback loops.
• Strong npm specifics: You're covering real pain points—provenance badges, exports field configuration, scoped packages with --access public, dist tags. That's the kind of depth that matters.
• Consistent terminology: "npm/package.json/versioning" runs through everything without wavering.

The Big One: Missing Complete Workflow

Your skill jumps between topics—versioning here, publishing there, validation scattered—but doesn't show a human-readable end-to-end flow. Someone publishing their first package needs: npm login → version bump → validation → publish → verification.

Why it matters: Right now, use...