lsp

I've been digging into LSP implementations and your skill's approach to progressive disclosure really stands out—the way you've structured the documentation to guide developers from basics to advanced concepts without overwhelming them is exactly what's missing from most language server resources.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 83/100, solid B grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices rubric. Your strongest area is Writing Style (9/10)—the technical voice is clean and objective. The weakest spots are Spec Compliance (12/15) and Progressive Disclosure (24/30), both fixable with some focused additions.

What's Working Well

• Solid trigger phrases: Your description nails the LSP vocabulary—"diagnostics," "completions," "hover," "go-to-definition" will get the skill surfacing for the right queries.
• Clean Quick Start example: The 24-line code snippet actually teaches something without bloat; it demonstrates connection setup and capability registration without being overwhelming.
• Smart provider table: Listing available LSP providers (textDocument/completion, textDocument/hover, etc.) gives developers flexibility without constraining their choices.
• Consistent terminology: You stick with LSP language throughout—TextDocuments, Capabilities, Connection—which makes the skill feel authoritative.

The Big One: Missing Workflow Guidance

This is what's costing you the most points. Right now you present concepts (Core Concepts, Key Patterns) but no procedural workflow. Developers don't know what order to do things in.

The fix: Add a numbered workflow section before Core Concepts:

## Implementation Workflow

1. **Set up connection** - Initialize ServerCapabilities and establish connection...