fastapi-backend

I've been diving into backend frameworks lately, and I'm curious what led you to structure the FastAPI setup this way—the organization feels intentional. With a 95/100, there's clearly a solid foundation here; I'd like to understand the thinking behind some of the architectural choices.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 95/100, solidly in A territory. This is based on Anthropic's skills best practices rubric. Your strongest area is Utility (19/20)—the skill genuinely solves real problems with JWT/JWKS patterns and SQLModel async handling. The weakest spot is Spec Compliance (11/15), mainly because your description is missing trigger phrases that help developers discover the skill when they need it.

What's Working Well

• Excellent layering in Progressive Disclosure: Your SKILL.md (645 lines) front-loads the essentials, then references deeper dives (jwt-verification.md, better-auth-sso-integration.md) for when people need them. That's the right balance.

• Strong utility through real patterns: The skill addresses actual pain points—MissingGreenlet prevention with async sessions, proper JWKS endpoint verification, role-based access control. These aren't theoretical; they're problems people hit in production.

• Self-documenting examples: Your code snippets include inline annotations explaining why things are structured a certain way, not just what they do. That's the difference between a reference and something someone can actually learn from.

• Comprehensive error handling patterns: You're showing proper HTTP status codes, validation error formatting, and audit logging examples. That's the kind of defensive coding that catches bugs before they ship.

The Big On...