helm

I took a look at your helm skill and wanted to share some thoughts.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 80/100, solidly in B territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices rubric. Your strongest area is Ease of Use (22/25) — your triggers and metadata are really well thought out. The main opportunity is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (22/30) — you're carrying too much weight in the base file with those examples.

What's Working Well

• Trigger coverage is chef's kiss — You've got intent-based triggers like "helm templating" and "debugging helm", plus regex patterns for Chart.yaml and values.yaml. That's exactly how you get discovered naturally.
• Practical constraints section — The Banned/Required patterns actually solve real Helm pain points (no hardcoded secrets, no loose labels). This isn't fluffy guidance.
• Solid few-shot examples — Two detailed examples with reasoning sections show actual deployment and secret management patterns. People can learn from this.

The Big One: Examples Are Bloating Your Token Load

Your few_shot_examples section runs 120+ lines inline. Every time someone loads this skill — even for a quick question about chart structure — they're pulling all that weight.

The fix: Move those examples to references/examples.md and keep just the pattern summary in SKILL.md:

few_shot_examples:
  - pattern: "Kubernetes secret injection"
    file: references/examples.md#secret-injection
  - pattern: "Multi-environment deployment"
    file: references/examples.md#multi-env

This nets you +3 points on PDA and keeps the skill snappy.

Other Things Worth Fixing

1. Anti-patterns and constraints are saying the same thing — You've got "Don't hardcode se...