pino

I took a look at your pino skill and wanted to share some thoughts.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 80/100, solid B-grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices rubric. Your Ease of Use is the strongest area (22/25) — the metadata and trigger coverage are really well thought out. The weakest spot is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (22/30) — there's room to make the content more scannable and token-efficient.

What's Working Well

• Metadata is chef's kiss — Your frontmatter has excellent trigger coverage for logging intents and Pino-specific patterns. The regex-based artifact triggers are solid.
• Templates are properly extracted — Separating logger setup and request logging templates keeps the main SKILL.md from bloating, and you've got good customization points documented.
• Practical patterns section — The good/bad code comparisons for things like child loggers, transports, and redaction actually help developers avoid mistakes.

The Big One: Missing Table of Contents

Your file is ~300 lines but has no TOC. This is hurting your PDA score and making navigation rough. Add a markdown TOC at the top:

## Contents

- [Quick Start](#quick-start)
- [Log Levels](#log-levels)
- [Child Loggers](#child-loggers)
- [Transports](#transports)
- [Redaction Patterns](#redaction-patterns)
- [Error Handling](#error-handling)
- [Anti-Patterns](#anti-patterns)

Then add matching anchor links to your section headers. This bumps you +2 points easily.

Other Things Worth Fixing

1. Verbose MCP examples — The <mcp_first> section includes full MCP calls with mainResearchGoal, researchGoal, and reasoning parameters. Condense these or move detailed patterns to a reference file. Saves tokens and improves readability. (+1 point)

2. Implicit workflow steps — You've got sections but no explicit "Step 1, Step 2" guide. Users have to infer the workflow. Add a numbered workflow: 1. Install dependencies → 2. Create logger.ts from template → 3. Add request middleware → 4. Verify redaction (+2 points)

3. Directory naming convention — You're using templates/ instead of references/. While it works, switching to references/ aligns with standard skill conventions and makes the structure more discoverable. Minor but worth noting. (+1 point)

Quick Wins

Fixing these three things gets you to 86/100 (A territory):

• Add TOC to the main file (+2)
• Number your workflow steps explicitly (+2)
• Trim verbose MCP calls (+1)

The skill itself is solid and useful — logging setup is genuinely a pain point in Node projects, and you've covered the real-world scenarios well. These are just structural polish to make it easier for developers to navigate and use.

Checkout your skill here: SkillzWave.ai | SpillWave We have an agentic skill installer that installs skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.