solidity

I took a look at your solidity skill and wanted to share some thoughts.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 79/100, solidly in C territory (70-79 range). This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices framework. Your strongest area is Ease of Use at 22/25—the metadata and trigger coverage are really solid. The weakness is Progressive Disclosure Architecture at 19/30, which is about how efficiently you're using tokens and structuring content for layered discovery.

What's Working Well

• Trigger coverage is chef's kiss — You've got regex patterns for .sol files, pragma statements, ERC standards, and specific security tools. Developers will actually find this skill when they need it.
• Security-first design — The CEI pattern enforcement, NatSpec requirements, and security checklist with actual checkboxes make this genuinely useful for the domain. Real value here.
• Complete contract template — You're not just explaining concepts; you've got a working example with comments. That's the kind of thing that saves time.
• Consistency throughout — You're using the same terminology (CEI, NatSpec, forge) consistently, so developers aren't confused about different ways to do the same thing.

The Big One: Duplicate Content Wasting Tokens

Here's what's holding you back the most: You're listing Trail of Bits skills twice — once in <security_tools> and again in <related_skills> with nearly identical descriptions. In a 299-line skill, that's meaningful token waste.

Why it matters: Progressive Disclosure Architecture rewards dense, non-redundant content. Duplication signals poor information architecture.

The fix: Keep the Trail of Bits skills in <related_skills> only. Then in `<security_too...