zod

I took a look at your zod skill and wanted to share some thoughts.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 77/100, solid C-grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices framework. Your strongest area is Ease of Use (22/25)—the metadata and triggers are really well thought out. The weakest link is Progressive Disclosure Architecture (20/30)—you've got good content, but it's all packed into one file and could be structured more efficiently.

What's Working Well

• Trigger coverage is chef's kiss – You've got specific regex patterns like z\.object and semantic intent triggers like "validate input with TypeScript types". That's the kind of specificity that actually gets skills activated when developers need them.

• Practical examples – Your three few-shot_examples with input/output/reasoning are solid. They address real pain points (v3→v4 migration) and show developers exactly how to apply the patterns.

• Clear constraints – You're upfront about what this skill covers (Zod v4) and what it doesn't. No hand-waving. That's good meta-awareness.

The Big One

You need a table of contents and reorganized structure. Right now you've got ~395 lines crammed into one SKILL.md file with implicit navigation through XML tags. That works, but it leaves +2-4 points on the table.

Here's what I'd do:

• Add a markdown TOC after the frontmatter listing Quick Start → Patterns → Constraints → Anti-Patterns → Examples
• Extract your three detailed examples to references/examples.md (keeps the main file leaner, easier to scan)
• Keep one minimal example inline for quick reference

Impact: This alone gets you +2 points closer to 80.

Other Things Worth Fixing

1. Merge anti-patterns into constraints –...