architect-agent

I took a look at your architect-agent skill and wanted to share some thoughts.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 93/100, which puts you solidly in A territory. This evaluation is based on Anthropic's skill best practices. Your strongest area is Spec Compliance (15/15) — your YAML frontmatter is solid and naming conventions are perfect. The weakest spot is Utility (18/20), mostly because you're missing some quick-reference examples that would make onboarding faster.

What's Working Well

• Progressive Disclosure Architecture is textbook — The 216-line SKILL.md routing to 33 reference files, 4 workflow guides, and 43 templates is exactly how PDA should work. You're not dumping everything upfront; you're layering information strategically.
• Trigger phrases are comprehensive — You've got 8+ specific action phrases ("plan multi-agent work", "delegate to code agents", "grade implementations") that make your skill actually discoverable. The "DO NOT Trigger For" section prevents false positives too, which is smart.
• Terminology is locked in — "architect/code agent", "instructions/human instructions", "grades" — you're consistent throughout, which matters way more than it sounds for maintainability.

The Big One: Redundant Routing Tables

Your Intent Classification and Decision Tree tables in SKILL.md are basically saying the same thing twice. You've got overlapping mappings between user phrases and actions, which wastes tokens and confuses users about which table to actually use.

Merge them into a single Decision Tree with three columns: Intent, Pre-condition, and Action. Instead of checking two tables, users check one. You'd drop m...