plantuml

I took a look at your plantuml skill and wanted to share some thoughts.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 88/100, solid B grade territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices rubric. Your strongest area is Ease of Use (23/25) — the trigger phrases and metadata are really well thought out. The weakest spot is Spec Compliance (13/15), which is mostly a formality issue, not a functionality problem.

What's Working Well

• Five crystal-clear trigger phrases in your metadata ("create diagram", "generate PlantUML", "convert puml", "extract diagrams", "prepare markdown for Confluence") — this is chef's kiss for discoverability. Most skills are vague here; yours tells users exactly when to call it.

• Progressive disclosure architecture is solid. SKILL.md stays lean as an index, and you've got 39 reference files organized logically under references/, troubleshooting/, and workflows/. Users can dive deep without drowning in the overview.

• Practical utility across three major workflows: text-to-diagram, code-to-diagram, and markdown processing. You're solving real problems developers actually face, especially the Confluence conversion angle.

The Big One: Redundant References Section

Your SKILL.md has a References section (lines 284-309) that duplicates navigation you already provided earlier. You list the same 19 diagram types both in your intent-to-diagram table AND again in the References section. This costs you about 2 points in Progressive Disclosure (Token Economy pillar).

The fix: Delete the redundant References section entirely. Your earlier "Get Started" section with the intent-to-diagram table already does the heavy lifting. If you want a references footer, make it a single compact link to `...