marketing-strategy-pmm

I checked out your marketing-strategy-pmm skill and noticed it's tackling positioning and messaging—areas where most folks either overthink or oversimplify. Your score landed at 73/100 (C grade), which tells me there's solid foundation here but some gaps in how the guidance flows.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 73/100, sitting squarely in C territory. This is based on Anthropic's layered architecture and progressive disclosure standards for agentic skills. Your Spec Compliance is chef's kiss (14/15)—metadata and YAML are clean. Your Utility is solid (16/20)—the PMM frameworks actually work. But Progressive Disclosure is the weak link (12/30)—that's where the biggest gains live.

What's Working Well

• Spec compliance is tight: Your frontmatter is valid, naming conventions follow the hyphen-case pattern, and you included license metadata. That's the foundation done right.
• Strong trigger terms: "PMM", "positioning", "GTM", "competitive analysis", "market entry"—you've got discoverability covered for the domain.
• Practical templates: The competitive battlecard template, messaging hierarchy structure, and launch checklists are genuinely useful. They give Claude actionable structure to work with.
• Real-world examples: You included Series A+ context and specific use cases that make this more than abstract theory.

The Big One: Single-File Bloat

Here's the thing: 1164 lines in one file violates the progressive disclosure architecture that makes skills actually useful at scale. You've got four reference files listed in your references section (positioning-frameworks.md, launch-checklists.md, international-gtm.md, messaging-templates.md) that don't actually exist—this is a compliance violation plus a missed structural opportunity.

The fix: Break SKILL.md down to 300-400 lines as your overview. Move the detailed playbooks into actual reference files:

• references/launch-checklists.md - All 90 lines of GTM Launch Playbook
• references/positioning-frameworks.md - Competitive positioning deep-dives
• references/international-gtm.md - Market-specific strategies
• references/messaging-templates.md - Copy frameworks and examples

This cuts token load in half and gives Claude proper layering to work through. Impact: +8 points on PDA alone.

Other Things Worth Fixing

1. Token economy needs compression (currently -7 points): Many sections use paragraph explanations where bullets would work. "Define ICP using firmographics and B2B intent signals" beats three paragraphs about ICPs.

2. Workflow steps are missing (currently -3 on Ease of Use): Strategic sections like ICP Definition and Competitive Analysis need numbered workflows. Add "Step 1→Step 2→Step 3" structures instead of narrative paragraphs.

3. Inconsistent command voice (currently -2 on Writing Style): Mix of "Create competitive battlecards" (good) and "This skill serves to..." (explanatory). Go pure imperative throughout—direct Claude, don't describe the skill.

4. Terminology jumping (minor but fixable): You use "PMM", "Product Marketing Manager", and "product marketing manager" interchangeably. Pick one and stick with it.

Quick Wins

• Highest ROI: Create the four reference files and move matching content. Single biggest score bump (+8 points).
• Next priority: Compress SKILL.md with bullet points over paragraphs; reduces cognitive load and token usage.
• Quick fix: Add numbered workflows to sections 1, 2, and 3; turn paragraphs into actionable steps.
• Polish: Standardize terminology and shift to pure imperative voice throughout.

Checkout your skill here: SkillzWave.ai | SpillWave We have an agentic skill installer that install skills in 14+ coding agent platforms. Check out this guide on how to improve your agentic skills.