battlecard-library

31 stars 7 forks
28
D

Template system for building, tagging, and distributing competitive battlecards.

Marketplace

Third-Party Agent Skill: Review the code before installing. Agent skills execute in your AI assistant's environment and can access your files. Learn more about security

Installation for Agentic Skill

View all platforms →
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-library
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-library --agent opencode
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-library --agent codex
skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/battlecard-library --agent gemini

First time? Install Skilz: pip install skilz

Works with 22+ AI coding assistants

Cursor, Aider, Copilot, Windsurf, Qwen, Kimi, and more...

View All Agents
Download Agent Skill ZIP

Extract and copy to ~/.claude/skills/ then restart Claude Desktop

1. Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/gtmagents/gtm-agents
2. Copy the agent skill directory:
cp -r gtm-agents/plugins/competitive-intelligence/skills/battlecard-library ~/.claude/skills/

Need detailed installation help? Check our platform-specific guides:

Related Agentic Skills

Agentic Skill Details

Repository
gtm-agents
Stars
31
Forks
7
Type
Non-Technical
Meta-Domain
development
Primary Domain
ci cd
Market Score
28

Agent Skill Grade

D
Score: 64/100 Click to see breakdown

Score Breakdown

Spec Compliance
11/15
PDA Architecture
18/30
Ease of Use
16/25
Writing Style
7/10
Utility
11/20
Modifiers: +1

Areas to Improve

  • Description needs trigger phrases
  • Missing Reference Files
  • No Actionable Workflow

Recommendations

  • Focus on improving Utility (currently 11/20)
  • Address 4 high-severity issues first
  • Add trigger phrases to description for discoverability

Graded: 2026-01-24

Developer Feedback

I've reviewed the battlecard-library skill and its 64/100 score. Here's a developer-to-developer opening:

I noticed your battlecard library takes a pretty opinionated stance on structuring competitive intelligence—curious what drove the decision to standardize the schema that way, since most teams I see end up with wildly different formats depending on who's authoring them.


Links:

The TL;DR

You're at 64/100, solidly in D territory. This is based on Anthropic's best practices for agentic skill design. Your strongest area is Spec Compliance (11/15)—the frontmatter is clean and properly formatted. The real drag is Utility (11/20) and Progressive Disclosure Architecture (18/30)—you're describing what battlecards are, but not giving people the tools to actually build them.

What's Working Well

  • Spec compliance is solid — Valid YAML, proper naming conventions (hyphen-case), required fields all there
  • Framework concepts are sound — Card structure, metadata tagging, and analytics tracking hit the real pain points in competitive intelligence
  • Consistent voice in core sections — When you do go imperative ("Embed", "Flag"), it's clear what you're asking people to do

The Big One: Missing Templates and Examples

This is your biggest lever. Right now you list template types in the Templates section but provide zero actual files. You mention "Battlecard deck/Notion template with modular sections" and "Objection handling table" but users can't immediately grab and use them.

The fix: Create a references/ directory with actual templates users can copy-paste:

  • references/templates/battlecard-notion.md — Complete Notion template with the framework s...

Report Security Issue

Found a security vulnerability in this agent skill?