co-branding

I found your co-branding skill while evaluating some recent submissions, and I'm curious about the design choice here—you're essentially building a bridge between two brand identities, which is trickier than it sounds at first glance. The 62 score suggests there's solid foundation but some areas where the implementation could be more polished—want to dig into what would make this more production-ready?

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 62/100, solidly in D territory. This is based on Anthropic's skill best practices framework. Your strongest area is Spec Compliance (11/15)—the metadata is clean and naming follows conventions. But Utility (11/20) and Ease of Use (14/25) are dragging things down. The core issue is that you've got the structure sketched out, but it feels more descriptive than prescriptive—it tells people what to check, not how to enforce it.

What's Working Well

• Clean YAML frontmatter – Valid structure with required fields, hyphen-case naming is correct
• Consistent terminology – You stick with "co-branding," "assets," and "partner" throughout, which makes it easy to follow
• Appropriate framework scope – Five conceptual areas (Brand Hierarchy, Messaging, Visual Assets, Legal/Compliance, Localization) actually covers the space well

The Big One: Missing Reference Files

Your skill mentions templates—"Co-branding checklist (logos, copy, disclaimers, accessibility, localization)" and "Visual reference guide with approved mockups"—but then doesn't actually provide them. This is a classic PDA layering problem. You should have:

• references/co-branding-checklist.md – Actual runnable checklist with checkboxes
• references/messaging-matrix-template.md – Te...