community-insight-taxonomy

31 stars 7 forks

Tagging schema for classifying community signals by persona, journey, and business impact.

Marketplace

Third-Party Agent Skill: Review the code before installing. Agent skills execute in your AI assistant's environment and can access your files. Learn more about security

Installation for Agentic Skill

View all platforms →

Claude Code (CLI) Fast

skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/community-insight-taxonomy

OpenCode (CLI) Fast

skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/community-insight-taxonomy --agent opencode

OpenAI Codex (CLI) Native

skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/community-insight-taxonomy --agent codex

Gemini CLI (Project) Project

skilz install gtmagents/gtm-agents/community-insight-taxonomy --agent gemini

First time? Install Skilz: pip install skilz

Works with 22+ AI coding assistants

Cursor, Aider, Copilot, Windsurf, Qwen, Kimi, and more...

View All Agents

For Claude Desktop Easy

Download Agent Skill ZIP

Extract and copy to ~/.claude/skills/ then restart Claude Desktop

Manual Installation

1. Clone the repository:

git clone https://github.com/gtmagents/gtm-agents

2. Copy the agent skill directory:

cp -r gtm-agents/plugins/community-building/skills/community-insight-taxonomy ~/.claude/skills/

Owner: gtmagents (GitHub)
Repository: gtm-agents
Stars: 31
Forks: 7
Type: Technical
Meta-Domain: data ai
Primary Domain: database
Market Score: 28

Agentic Skill Grades →

Agent Skill Grade

Score: 58/100 Click to see breakdown

Score Breakdown

Spec Compliance

11/15

PDA Architecture

13/30

Ease of Use

14/25

Writing Style

9/10

Utility

10/20

Modifiers: +1

Areas to Improve

Description needs trigger phrases
Missing Reference Files
No Actionable Workflow

Recommendations

Focus on improving Pda (currently 13/30)
Focus on improving Ease Of Use (currently 14/25)
Focus on improving Utility (currently 10/20)

Graded: 2026-01-24

Developer Feedback

I checked out your community-insight-taxonomy skill and there's some solid foundational thinking here—the taxonomical approach to categorizing insights is genuinely useful. That said, the 58/100 score suggests there are some gaps between the concept and execution that might be worth exploring, particularly around how discoverable and actionable the taxonomy actually is for developers using it.

Links:

TL;DR

You're at 58/100, solidly in F territory. The grading is based on Anthropic's five-pillar rubric for agentic skills. Writing style is your strongest pillar (9/10—clear, objective prose) but Progressive Disclosure Architecture is dragging you down (13/30)—you're cramming everything into 32 lines with no supporting reference files, and Ease of Use (14/25) suffers because there's no actionable workflow, just a list of dimensions.

What's Working Well

Writing voice is tight. You're using imperative/infinitive tone correctly throughout, zero marketing fluff. Graders noticed that right away.
Terminology is consistent. "Persona," "journey," "driver," "sentiment"—these terms track cleanly through the entire skill with no conflicting definitions.
Structure is clear. Your headers are well-organized and the content flows logically from framework → tips → integration points.

The Big One: Missing Reference Files

This is your biggest opportunity. Your Templates section promises three things ("Tag dictionary with definitions," "Airtable/Sheet schema," "Quick-reference cheatsheet") but none of these files actually exist. This tanks your PDA score (Progressive Disclosure) because you're not layering your content—you're just talking about layers.

**The...

Browse Category

More data ai Agentic Skills

Report Security Issue

Found a security vulnerability in this agent skill?