creative-iteration-playbook

I've been digging through some skill implementations, and I noticed your creative-iteration-playbook uses an interesting approach to structuring the workflow—the framing around iteration cycles really stood out, though I think there's room to tighten up how you're guiding developers through the actual decision points.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 68/100, which puts you in D territory. Based on Anthropic's agentic skill best practices, your strongest area is Spec Compliance (11/15)—the frontmatter is solid—but Progressive Disclosure Architecture (18/30) is where you're bleeding points. The core issue: you're cramming everything into one 55-line file when templates, workflows, and examples belong in separate reference files.

What's Working Well

• Solid spec compliance – Your YAML frontmatter is valid, and the kebab-case naming is correct.
• Clear cadence structure – The numbered workflow steps (intake → concept → script → edit → QA → publish) give developers something concrete to follow.
• Consistent terminology – "Creative," "guardrails," "variants" stay consistent throughout, which is helpful for token efficiency.

The Big One: Missing Reference Files

Here's what's holding you back: you're listing templates and workflows inline instead of breaking them into separate reference files. Right now, section 3 just says:

• Single-slide creative brief + checklist.
• Experiment tracker w/ hypotheses, variants, outcomes, next steps.

But developers need to actually see what these look like. Create a references/ directory with:

• references/creative-brief-template.md – Actual template with fields like [HOOK], [CTA], [PROOF], [EDITING NOTES]
• `ref...