mcp-builder

I've been diving into MCP implementations lately, and your approach to wrapping the builder pattern is pretty thoughtful—especially how you handle the validation flow without over-engineering it. Scored a solid 90, so curious what you'd prioritize if you were to iterate on it next.

Links:

• GitHub
• Your agentic skill in the SkillzWave marketplace

The TL;DR

You're at 90/100, A territory. This is based on Anthropic's Claude Skills Best Practices. Your strongest area is Ease of Use (23/25)—the trigger terms and workflow clarity are solid. The weakest spot is Spec Compliance (13/15), mainly because you're only using 1-2 trigger phrases when you could be more explicit.

What's Working Well

• Layered structure is chef's kiss. SKILL.md stays tight at 314 lines with 5 focused reference files. That's how you do Progressive Disclosure right—no token waste, but comprehensive when developers dig deeper.
• Your trigger terms nail discoverability. "MCP server," "FastMCP," "Python SDK," "Node SDK"—these activate naturally when someone needs to build something. That's why Ease of Use scored 23/25.
• The 4-phase workflow is clear. Research → Implementation → Testing → Evaluation, each with actionable subsections and checklists. Developers know exactly what phase they're in and what to do next.
• Examples in both Python and TypeScript. Shows you understand your audience isn't monolithic. That adds real utility (18/20 there).

The Big One: Missing Navigation in Long Files

Your reference files are dense—719, 970, 602 lines in some cases—but no table of contents. This kills navigation signals and costs you 2-3 points on Progressive Disclosure.

The fix: Add a TOC right after the frontmatter in SKILL.md and any reference file over 100 lines...